ABSTRACT
Evaluating the serum cross-neutralization responses after breakthrough infection with various SARS-CoV-2 variants provides valuable insight for developing variant-proof COVID-19 booster vaccines. However, fairly comparing the impact of breakthrough infections with distinct epidemic timing on cross-neutralization responses, influenced by the exposure interval between vaccination and infection, is challenging. To compare the impact of pre-Omicron to Omicron breakthrough infection, we estimated the effects on cross-neutralizing responses by the exposure interval using Bayesian hierarchical modeling. The saturation time required to generate saturated cross-neutralization responses differed by variant, with variants more antigenically distant from the ancestral strain requiring longer intervals of 2-4 months. The breadths of saturated cross-neutralization responses to Omicron lineages were comparable in pre-Omicron and Omicron breakthrough infections. Our results highlight the importance of vaccine dosage intervals of 4 months or longer, regardless of the antigenicity of the exposed antigen, to maximize the breadth of serum cross-neutralization covering SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages. Graphical
ABSTRACT
Understanding the differences in serum cross-neutralizing responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron sub-lineages BA.5, BA.2.75, and BQ.1.1, elicited by exposure to distinct antigens is essential for developing COVID-19 booster vaccines with enhanced cross-protection against antigenically distinct variants. However, fairly comparing the impact of breakthrough infection on serum neutralizing responses to several variants with distinct epidemic timing is challenging because responses after breakthrough infection are affected by the exposure interval between vaccination and infection. We assessed serum cross-neutralizing responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron sub-lineages, in individuals with breakthrough infections before or during the Omicron BA.1 epidemic. To understand the differences in serum cross-neutralizing responses after pre-Omicron or Omicron breakthrough infection, we used Bayesian hierarchical modeling to correct the cross-neutralizing responses for the exposure interval between vaccination and breakthrough infection. The exposure interval required to generate saturated cross-neutralizing potency against each variant differed by variant, with variants more antigenically distant from the ancestral strain requiring a longer interval. Additionally, Omicron breakthrough infection was estimated to have higher impact than booster vaccination and pre-Omicron breakthrough infection on inducing serum neutralizing responses to the ancestral strain and Omicron sub-lineages. However, the breadth of cross-neutralizing responses to Omicron sub-lineages, including BQ.1.1, after Omicron or pre-Omicron breakthrough infection with the ideal exposure interval were estimated to be comparable. Our results highlight the importance of optimizing the interval between vaccine doses for maximizing the breadth of cross-neutralizing activity elicited by booster vaccines with or without Omicron antigen.
Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain , COVID-19ABSTRACT
The diversity of SARS-CoV-2 mutations raises the possibility of reinfection of individuals previously infected with earlier variants, and this risk is further increased by the emergence of the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant. In this study, we used an in vivo, hamster infection model to assess the potential for individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be reinfected with Omicron variant and we also investigated the pathology associated with such infections. Initially, Syrian hamsters were inoculated with a lineage A, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.617.2 or a subvariant of Omicron, BA.1 strain and then reinfected with the BA.1 strain 5 weeks later. Subsequently, the impact of reinfection with Omicron subvariants (BA.1 and BA.2) in individuals previously infected with the BA.1 strain was examined. Although viral infection and replication were suppressed in both the upper and lower airways, following reinfection, virus-associated RNA was detected in the airways of most hamsters. Viral replication was more strongly suppressed in the lower respiratory tract than in the upper respiratory tract. Consistent amino acid substitutions were observed in the upper respiratory tract of infected hamsters after primary infection with variant BA.1, whereas diverse mutations appeared in hamsters reinfected with the same variant. Histopathology showed no acute pneumonia or disease enhancement in any of the reinfection groups and, in addition, the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the airways of reinfected animals was only mildly elevated. These findings are important for understanding the risk of reinfection with new variants of SARS-CoV-2.
Subject(s)
Pneumonia , Virus DiseasesABSTRACT
The prevalence of the Omicron subvariant BA.2.75 is rapidly increasing in India and Nepal. In addition, BA.2.75 has been detected in at least 34 other countries and is spreading globally. However, the virological features of BA.2.75 are largely unknown. Here, we evaluated the replicative ability and pathogenicity of BA.2.75 clinical isolates in Syrian hamsters. Although we found no substantial differences in weight change among hamsters infected with BA.2, BA.5, or BA.2.75, the replicative ability of BA.2.75 in the lungs was higher than that of BA.2 and BA.5. Of note, BA.2.75 caused focal viral pneumonia in hamsters, characterized by patchy inflammation interspersed in alveolar regions, which was not observed in BA.5-infected hamsters. Moreover, in competition assays, BA.2.75 replicated better than BA.5 in the lungs of hamsters. These results suggest that BA.2.75 can cause more severe respiratory disease than BA.5 and BA.2 and should be closely monitored.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Diseases , Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar , PneumoniaABSTRACT
The BA.2 sublineage of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has become dominant in most countries around the world; however, the prevalence of BA.4 and BA.5 is increasing rapidly in several regions. BA.2 is less pathogenic in animal models than previously circulating variants of concern (VOC). Compared with BA.2, however, BA.4 and BA.5 possess additional substitutions in the spike protein, which play a key role in viral infectivity, raising concerns that the infectivity and pathogenicity of BA.4 and BA.5 are higher than those of BA.2. Here, we evaluated the replicative ability and pathogenicity of authentic BA.4 and BA.5 isolates in wild-type Syrian hamsters and human ACE2 (hACE2) transgenic hamsters. In contrast to recent data with a recombinant chimeric virus possessing the spike protein of BA.4/BA.5 in the background of a BA.2 strain, we observed no obvious differences among BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 isolates in growth ability or pathogenicity in hamsters, and less pathogenicity compared to a previously circulating Delta (B.1.617.2 lineage) isolate. In addition, in vivo competition experiments revealed that BA.5 outcompeted BA.2 in hamsters, whereas BA.4 and BA.2 exhibited similar fitness. These findings suggest that BA.4 and BA.5 have similar pathogenicity to BA.2 in rodents and that BA.5 possesses viral fitness superior to that of BA.2. Our study highlights the importance of using authentic isolates when evaluating virological features.
ABSTRACT
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant BA.2 has spread in many countries, replacing the earlier Omicron subvariant BA.1 and other variants. Here, using a cell culture infection assay, we quantified the intrinsic sensitivity of BA.2 and BA.1 compared with other variants of concern, Alpha, Gamma, and Delta, to five approved-neutralizing antibodies and antiviral drugs. Our assay revealed the diverse sensitivities of these variants to antibodies, including the loss of response of both BA.1 and BA.2 to casirivimab and of BA.1 to imdevimab. In contrast, EIDD-1931 and nirmatrelvir showed a more conserved activities to these variants. The viral response profile combined with mathematical analysis estimated differences in antiviral effects among variants in the clinical concentrations. These analyses provide essential evidence that gives insight into the impact of variant emergence on choosing optimal drug treatment.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus InfectionsABSTRACT
Background: The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in Japan in November 2021. This variant contains up to 36 mutations in the spike protein, the target of neutralizing antibodies, and can escape vaccine-induced immunity. The third booster vaccination campaign began with healthcare workers and high-risk groups. The safety and immunogenicity of third booster vaccination against Omicrons remain unknown. Methods: In total, 272 healthcare workers were evaluated for their long-term safety and immunogenicity. Here, we established vaccine panels to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity against variants of concern (VOCs), including the Omicron variant, using a live virus microneutralization assay. Findings: Two-dose vaccination induced robust anti-spike antibodies and neutralization titers (NTs) against the ancestral strain WK-521, whereas NTs in VOCs were significantly decreased. Within 93-247 days of the second vaccine dose, NTs against Omicron were completely abolished in up to 80% of individuals among the vaccine panels. The third booster vaccination induced a robust increase in anti-spike antibodies and NTs against the WK-521, Delta, and Omicron variants. The breadth of humoral immunity and cross-reactivity with Omicron increased. The cytokine signature and adverse event rate remained unchanged after three dose vaccination. Conclusions: The third vaccination dose is safe and effective against Omicron infection.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus InfectionsABSTRACT
Background The immune profile against SARS-CoV-2 has dramatically diversified due to a complex combination of exposure to vaccines and infection by various lineages/variants, likely generating a heterogeneity in protective immunity in a given population. To further complicate this, the Omicron variant, with numerous spike mutations, has emerged. These circumstances have created the need to assess the potential of immune evasion by the Omicron in individuals with various immune histories. Methods The neutralization susceptibility of the variants including the Omicron and their ancestor was comparably assessed using a panel of plasma/serum derived from individuals with divergent immune histories. Blood samples were collected from either mRNA vaccinees or from those who suffered from breakthrough infections by the Alpha/Delta with multiple time intervals following vaccination. Findings The Omicron was highly resistant to neutralization in fully vaccinated individuals without a history of breakthrough infections. In contrast, robust cross-neutralization against the Omicron were induced in vaccinees that experienced breakthrough infections. The time interval between vaccination and infection, rather than the variant types of infection, was significantly correlated with the magnitude and potency of Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions Immune histories with breakthrough infections can overcome the resistance to infection by the Omicron, with the vaccination-infection interval being the key determinant of the magnitude and breadth of neutralization. The diverse exposure history in each individual warrants a tailored and cautious approach to understanding population immunity against the Omicron and future variants. Funding This study was supported by grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).
Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain , Death , Encephalomyelitis, Acute DisseminatedABSTRACT
Effective vaccines are essential for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently-developed vaccines inducing SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are effective, but the appearance of NAb-resistant S variant viruses is of great concern. A vaccine inducing S-independent or NAb-independent SARS-CoV-2 control may contribute to containment of these variants. Here, we investigated the efficacy of an intranasal vaccine expressing viral non-S antigens against intranasal SARS-CoV-2 challenge in cynomolgus macaques. Nine vaccinated macaques exhibited significantly reduced viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs on day 2 post-challenge compared to nine unvaccinated controls. The viral control in the absence of SARS-CoV-2-specific NAbs was significantly correlated with vaccine-induced viral antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Our results indicate that CD8+ T-cell induction by intranasal vaccination can result in NAb-independent control of SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting a potential of vaccine-induced CD8+ T-cell responses to contribute to COVID-19 containment.Funding: This work was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED [JP19fk0108104 to A.K.-T. and JP20nk0101601, JP20jm0110012, JP21fk0410035, JP21fk0108125, and JP21jk0210002 to T.M.]) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) in Japan (JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21H02745 to T.M.]).Declaration of Interests: H.I., K.K., R.S., and T.M are the inventors on Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application for SeV-NME vaccine. Authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.Ethics Approval Statement: Approval by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments in NIID (permission number: 520001) under the guidelines for animal experiments in accordance with the Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments established by the Science Council of Japan.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 infection presents clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to fatal respiratory failure. Despite the induction of functional SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in convalescent individuals, the role of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in the control of SARS-CoV-2 replication remains unknown. In the present study, we show that subacute SARS-CoV-2 replication can be controlled in the absence of CD8+ T cells in cynomolgus macaques. Eight macaques were intranasally inoculated with 105 or 106 TCID50 of SARS-CoV-2, and three of the eight macaques were treated with a monoclonal anti-CD8 antibody on days 5 and 7 post-infection. In these three macaques, CD8+ T cells were undetectable on day 7 and thereafter, while virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were induced in the remaining five untreated animals. Viral RNA was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs for 10-17 days post-infection in all macaques, and the kinetics of viral RNA levels in pharyngeal swabs and plasma neutralizing antibody titers were comparable between the anti-CD8 antibody treated and untreated animals. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the pharyngeal mucosa and/or retropharyngeal lymph node obtained at necropsy on day 21 in two of the untreated group but undetectable in all macaques treated with anti-CD8 antibody. CD8+ T-cell responses may contribute to viral control in SARS-CoV-2 infection, but our results indicate possible containment of subacute viral replication in the absence of CD8+ T cells, implying that CD8+ T-cell dysfunction may not solely lead to viral control failure. Author SummarySARS-CoV-2 infection presents a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to fatal respiratory failure. The determinants for failure in viral control and/or fatal disease progression have not been elucidated fully. Both acquired immune effectors, antibodies and CD8+ T cells, are considered to contribute to viral control. However, it remains unknown whether a deficiency in either of these two arms is directly linked to failure in the control of SARS-CoV-2 replication. In the present study, to know the requirement of CD8+ T cells for viral control after the establishment of infection, we examined the effect of CD8+ cell depletion by monoclonal anti-CD8 antibody administration in the subacute phase on SARS-CoV-2 replication in cynomolgus macaques. Unexpectedly, our analysis revealed no significant impact of CD8+ cell depletion on viral replication, indicating that subacute SARS-CoV-2 replication can be controlled in the absence of CD8+ T cells. CD8+ T-cell responses may contribute to viral control in SARS-CoV-2 infection, but this study suggests that CD8+ T-cell dysfunction may not solely lead to viral control failure or fatal disease progression.